Family groups and multi-entity holdings
Multi-entity family groups outgrow spreadsheet finance quietly. Governance, consolidated reporting and one control environment across the companies, without imposing a corporate bureaucracy.
Family groups rarely have a finance problem in one company. They have a visibility problem across several.
The situation this usually starts from
The pattern repeats across Riyadh and the wider GCC:
- Several legal entities, each with its own bookkeeping, and no consolidated view anyone trusts.
- Related-party transactions between the companies that nobody has documented properly.
- A capable accountant per entity, and nobody above them who can challenge the numbers.
- Decisions made on the principal's judgment, which has been right for years, but with no numbers to test the next one against.
- A bank, a partner or a prospective investor now asking for the kind of reporting the group has never produced.
Nothing here is a crisis. That is precisely why it goes unaddressed until an audit, a financing or a succession conversation forces it.
What I do
The goal is a group that can be understood from the outside without changing how the family runs it.
- Consolidation that holds up. One chart of accounts across entities, intercompany and related-party transactions identified and eliminated properly, and a monthly consolidated pack that reconciles.
- Governance sized to the group. Approval limits, separation of duties and audit logging that match how decisions are actually made. Not a corporate bureaucracy imported from a multinational.
- A control environment an outsider recognises. The controls an external audit, a lender or diligence expects to find, documented rather than assumed.
- Tax handled at group level. Zakat, VAT and withholding tax planned across entities ahead of deadlines, including how the intercompany flows are treated.
- Reporting the principals will actually read. One page that answers what the group made, what it holds, and what the cash is doing, before the detail behind it.
The proof
I built the finance, HR and IT shared-services function for a multi-entity studio group in Riyadh, then designed and shipped the operating system it runs on: multi-company from the ground up, with approval workflows, separation of duties, audit logging and per-company data isolation, covering GL, AR/AP, VAT, HR, payroll and GOSI in English and Arabic.
Before that I led FP&A for a multi-sector group across manufacturing, telecom and MEP, running investment feasibility studies and scenario planning and designing the internal-control structures and SOPs that raised process discipline across the group.
Who this fits
A good fit if: you run two or more entities, you want consolidated numbers and proper governance, and you would rather have one senior person part time than build a group finance department.
Not a fit if: what you need is bookkeeping capacity. That is a different hire, and a cheaper one.
How it works commercially
Usually fractional: a fixed number of days a month on an ongoing basis, because governance is a habit rather than a project. Where the group needs a specific build, a consolidation model or an ERP, that runs as a fixed-scope project alongside.
Questions
Will this force the family to change how decisions are made?
No. Governance should match how the group actually operates, not import a multinational's bureaucracy. What changes is that decisions become traceable and the numbers behind them hold up when a bank, an auditor or a partner asks.
Can you work across entities in different sectors?
Yes. My background spans media, real estate, manufacturing, FMCG and logistics, and most family groups I work with hold companies in more than one of those.
